Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Weaver v. Fries et al
as 1:2013cv00359
Plaintiff:
David Weaver
Defendant:
Ken Fries, Tina Kefaber, Jacob E Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLS v. KRUSE et al
as 3:2013mc00010
Respondent:
REA BAKER and BRETT KRUSE
Petitioner:
ANTHONY C. WALLS
CROCKETT v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2013cv01840
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, DICK, DUNN and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CROCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Haury v. Lemon et al
as 3:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter Haury
Defendant:
Bruce Lemon, Mark R Sevier, Daryl Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00554
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
MARVELLA G. WALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
MOORE v. ZENK et al
as 2:2012cv00376
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, FRENCH, HERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00637
Plaintiff:
Douglas Walls
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet U.S. Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN et al v. TOWNSEND
as 1:2012cv01194
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BROWN and STEPHANIE LYN WALL
Defendant:
TONYA TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
WALL et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2012cv00693
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA CASUALTY GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON, JOHN DOE and BYRAN HARMON
Plaintiff:
BOBBY WALL and CHRISTA D. WALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DeLange et al v. Indiana Laminated Wall Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Allen DeLange , James Mitchell, Sr and Local 460 Northwest Indiana District Council 91 IUPAT AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Indiana Laminated Wall Corporation and Joseph H Rettig
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
