Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Gorbey v. Warden Terry Billingsley et al
as 1:2012cv03140
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden Terry Billingsley, Regional Director Norwood and Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reginald M Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv02722
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Chief Deputy Warden John Doe, Chief Deputy Warden John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald M Williams
Gregory Ott v. Terri Gonzalez et al
as 2:2011cv04958
Respondent:
Matthew Cate, Matthew Cate, D Eugler and others
Petitioner:
Gregory Ott
Gregory Joseph Ott v. Terri Gonzalez
as 2:2011cv04225
Respondent:
Warden Terri Gonzalez
Petitioner:
Gregory Joseph Ott
Juan Francisco Perez v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2011cv03510
Respondent:
County of Los Angeles, Superior Court of California and Warden Terry
Petitioner:
Juan Francisco Perez
Geoff Paul Newman v. Terri Gonzalez
as 2:2011cv01347
Respondent:
Warden Terri Gonzalez
Petitioner:
Geoff Paul Newman
Garrett v. O'Brien
as 7:2010cv00338
Petitioner:
Floyd Garrett
Respondent:
Warden Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oglesbee v. O'Brien et al
as 7:2010cv00322
Defendant:
A.M. Shift Prison Guards, Anders, Mr. Fortner and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Oglesbee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boose v. O'Brien
as 7:2010cv00286
Petitioner:
Phillip E Boose
Respondent:
Warden Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chase v. O'Brien et al
as 7:2010cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jihad Chase
Defendant:
Four Unknown Named SHU Officers, BOP Director Harley Lappin, Warden Terry O'Brien and others
FNU:
Associate Warden Stricklen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
