Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Washington v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03045
Petitioner:
Marcus B. Washington
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv04113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Demos v. Washington, State of et al
as 5:2009cv03277
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Washington, State of, United States of America, Columbia, District of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simmons et al v. Waste Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02558
Plaintiff:
Scott Simmons, Henry Roberts, Paul Klemme, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Management of Kansas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Washington v. Roberts
as 5:2009cv03148
Petitioner:
Marcus B. Washington
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2009cv01124
Plaintiff:
Hazel Washington
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen v. Washington National Insurance Co. et al
as 6:2009cv01078
Plaintiff:
Colleen Allen
Defendant:
Washington National Insurance Co., Washington National Insurance Co., Conseco Services, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Washington v. Spirit Aerosystems, Inc.
as 2:2009cv02123
Plaintiff:
Gary Washington and Gary Washington
Defendant:
Spirit Aerosystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Chester
as 5:2008cv03304
Petitioner:
George Washington Williams
Respondent:
C Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
