Cases 41 - 50 of 1,974
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
White et al v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Ronald White and Mona White
Defendant:
Exactech Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Eakins v. Austin Lloyd, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Annamarie F Eakins and Annamarie F. Eakins
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc, Austin Coins, Inc., Brandon E Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fikse v. Austin Lloyd, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
John H Fikse and John H. Fikse
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc., Austin Coins, Inc., Eric P. Lesak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nowell v. Austin Coins, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bobby Nowell
Defendant:
Austin Coins, Inc, Eric P Lesak, Timothy James King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Goodwin v. Monroe County Department of Human Services et al
as 6:2024cv06020
Plaintiff:
Daryl Goodwin and Armani D. Goodwin
Defendant:
Monroe County Department of Human Services, Lynn White, Supv Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frascarelli v. Physicians Realty Trust et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mark Frascarelli and John White
Defendant:
Physicians Realty Trust, John T. Thomas, Tommy G. Thompson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv11296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv11326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
