Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jenkins et al v. McCalla Raymer, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv03732
Plaintiff:
Wendy N. Jenkins and Eleanor Spratlin Crawford
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer, LLC, Thomas A. Sears, Esq., Charles Troy Crouse, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Infinity Performance, Inc. v. Wilder Fitness Equipment, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03324
Plaintiff:
Infinity Performance, Inc.
Defendant:
Wilder Fitness Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation v. Shaw et al
as 2:2010cv00151
Petitioner:
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation
Respondent:
Brian H. Shaw, Hoke S. Wilder, III and Yellow Bluff Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Wilder v. Lawson et al
as 1:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wilder
Defendant:
Gerald Lawson, Latrelle Mercier and Zellars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Lawson et al
as 1:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wilder
Defendant:
Gerald Lawson, Latrelle Mercier and Zellars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008mi00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Wilder v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00376
Plaintiff:
Mary Wilder
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
