Cases 41 - 50 of 5,166
Davis v. State of Florida
as 6:2024cv01131
Petitioner:
Lawrence Allen Davis
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Stokes et al
as 6:2024cv01113
Defendant:
Brain D. Stokes, Dr. Andrea Singh and Andrew Asher Bain
Plaintiff:
Semiya Tahira Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Barton v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00304
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Petitioner:
Davis Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00599
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Walton v. Merrett et al
as 3:2024cv00581
Defendant:
Diidre Wells, Trudeau, Robert Carl Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Roshawn J Davis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Evers v. The Sports Mall, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01341
Defendant:
The Sports Mall, LLC doing business as SportsCollectibles.com and Davis & Darnell Computer Services LLC doing business as Nittany Web Works
Plaintiff:
Alex Evers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
DESHIELDS v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00105
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
DAVIS ALAN DESHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Norfleet v. Charlotte County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
Charlotte County Jail and Officer Davie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
