Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2008cv03082
Plaintiff:
Raul Martinez
Defendant:
M. MARTIN, Powell, PASAO and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mauskar v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv00591
Plaintiff:
Anant Mauskar
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Francisco Quintana, M. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Santos v. Upton et al
as 1:2008cv00310
Plaintiff:
Carols J Santos
Defendant:
J Upton, J Stobo, J Womble and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pinson v. McGehee et al
as 1:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Vaughn Pinson
Defendant:
M McGehee, John Womble and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shockley v. Womble et al
as 1:2008cv00008
Plaintiff:
Antoine Shockley
Defendant:
John Womble, Anton Villasan, UP Holcombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Nickles et al
as 1:2007cv00986
Defendant:
UP Nickles, John B Fox and John Womble
Plaintiff:
David D Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shockley v. Fox et al
as 1:2007cv00904
Plaintiff:
Antoine Shockley
Defendant:
John Fox, T C Outlaw, Ricardo Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Green v. Womble et al
as 1:2007cv00471
Plaintiff:
Macee Dion Green
Defendant:
John Womble, Davis Doughty, John Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons - Beaumont et al
as 1:2007cv00346
Plaintiff:
Jeremy V Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons - Beaumont, John B Fox, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
