Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Craccolici v. Luzerne County et al
as 4:2015cv00618
Plaintiff:
Joseph Craccolici
Defendant:
Luzerne County , Luzerne County Correctional Facility , James J. Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Larson et al
as 3:2015cv00449
Petitioner:
Byron Christopher Dixon
Respondent:
James Larson and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Larson et al
as 3:2015cv00425
Plaintiff:
Byron Christopher Dixon
Defendant:
James Larson, Robert Lawton and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muchler v. Smith Bail Bonds LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Muchler
Defendant:
Smith Bail Bonds LLC, J. Allen Nesbitt, James Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LARSON et al v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07223
Plaintiff:
JANA LEANN LARSON and RYAN LARSON
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC., MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Krushin v. Luzerne County Correctional Facility Administration et al
as 4:2014cv02274
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Krushin
Defendant:
Luzerne County Correctional Facility Administration, Gunner Kosek, Sharon Francoure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Hartlep et al
as 1:2014cv02001
Plaintiff:
John D. Larson
Defendant:
Jennifer R. Hartlep and Dauphin County Office of District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mungin v. Larson et al
as 1:2014cv01616
Plaintiff:
Bruce Mungin
Defendant:
James Larson and Dan Baluta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olszyk v. Larson et al
as 3:2014cv01470
Plaintiff:
John Olszyk
Defendant:
James Larson, Dr. Kosek, Chung Row and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAMB et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05825
Plaintiff:
EVA LAMB , PATRICIA LAMBERT , JAMES A. LANCASTER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION , SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOSEPH A. NICHOLS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
