Cases 41 - 50 of 9,639
Brown et al v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Danae Brown and Amanda Andrews
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gilstrap v. Equifax Information Service
as 1:2024cv01632
Plaintiff:
Sammy E. Gilstrap
Defendant:
Equifax Information Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gilstrap v. HR True Check Inc.
as 1:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Sammy E. Gilstrap
Defendant:
HR True Check Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP v. D'AMICO
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP
Defendant:
Alexander D'Amico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Enterprise Bank & Trust v. CRS Standard Financial Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00933
Defendant:
Nadezda Voronova, CRS Standard Financial Technologies, Inc. and Nadezhda Voronova
Plaintiff:
Enterprise Bank & Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TAN v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
JONAH TAN
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 AKA "Agatha Li" and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lugo v. Credit Home, Corp. et al
as 6:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Ellud Lugo
Defendant:
Credit Home, Corp. and Alfredo J. Olivares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Skarzynski v. Ramindesign, LLC
as 1:2024cv20868
Plaintiff:
Jacek Skarzynski
Defendant:
Ramindesign, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
MARVIL-RODRIGUEZ et al v. CitiBank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv21400
Plaintiff:
SALLIE ANNE MARVIL-RODRIGUEZ and VISIONARY PLANNING, INC.
Defendant:
CitiBank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Gates v. Nalley Chevolet et al
as 1:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
Henry Louis Gates
Defendant:
Nalley Chevolet, Citizens Bank, Dalia Maisonet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
