Cases 41 - 50 of 702
SANDERS v. PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv01703
Plaintiff:
DEIDRE SANDERS
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and PRP ADVISORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BYRD v. MORTGAGE RESEARCH CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv01213
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BYRD
Defendant:
MORTGAGE RESEARCH CENTER doing business as VETERANS UNTIED HOME LOANS, MIDFIRST BANK and THE MONEY SOURCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
THOMAS v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
JAZMYN THOMAS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
SAN MARCO et al v. DUVERA BILLING SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMES SAN MARCO and MINDY SAN MARCO
Defendant:
DUVERA BILLING SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RIVERA v. STEARNS LENDING LLC
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
LUIS MIGUEL RIVERA
Defendant:
STEARNS LENDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
JOHNSON v. ROV MAIN, INC et al
as 2:2022cv05219
Plaintiff:
JASMINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
ROV MAIN, INC and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. AUTO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
DONAHUE et al v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 1:2022cv07306
Plaintiff:
KEITH DONAHUE and DOCTOR FIX-IT, LLC
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
DYSON v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
BRAD DYSON
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION d/b/a PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES and PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION doing business as PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BUSSEY, III v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 3:2022cv07241
Plaintiff:
HARRY B. BUSSEY, III
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JOANNA v. ROUTE 22 HONDA
as 2:2022cv07117
Plaintiff:
PARKER RONEISHA JOANNA
Defendant:
ROUTE 22 HONDA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
