Cases 41 - 50 of 1,002
Lacy v. Kohl's Corporation
as 2:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lacy
Defendant:
Kohl's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Cox v. Iowa Health System dba UnityPoint Health
as 4:2023cv04058
Plaintiff:
Tamara Cox
Defendant:
Iowa Health System dba UnityPoint Health and Trinity Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
EHLINGER v. THE CHILDREN'S BUREAU, INC.
as 1:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
JAMES EHLINGER
Defendant:
THE CHILDREN'S BUREAU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
BICKETT v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY
as 1:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
NORA LUCILLE BICKETT
Defendant:
THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
McCarter v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03280
Plaintiff:
Brandon McCarter
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adel Nassar v. Dufresne Spencer Group, LLC
as 23-1732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADEL NASSAR
Defendant / Appellee:
DUFRESNE SPENCER GROUP, LLC, doing business as ASHLEY FURNITURE
Rubio v. Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC
as 1:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rubio
Defendant:
Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC doing business as Asurion Tech Repair & Solutions
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Vargas v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 3:2023cv50108
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Beal v. Chicago Transit Authority et al
as 1:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Ernest Beal
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority and Kanitha Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cervantes v. Great Lakes Coca-Cola Distribution LLC
as 1:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
David Cervantes
Defendant:
Great Lakes Coca-Cola Distribution LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
