Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Stephens et al v. Bristol Park Apartments et al
as 4:2011cv00557
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Stephens , Natasha Stephens , TS and others
Defendant:
Bristol Park Apartments, Ledic Management Inc and JRK Residential Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
McCollum et al v. Arbors of Little Rock LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Linda McCollum and Roner Mitchell
Defendant:
Arbors of Little Rock LLC and Case & Associates Properties Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
King's Ranch of Jonesboro Incorporated v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of
as 3:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
King's Ranch of Jonesboro Incorporated
Defendant:
Jonesboro Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
McNeal v. Doe
as 5:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Floyd E McNeal
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Wise v. Eagle et al
as 5:2009cv05133
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. Wise
Defendant:
Judy Eagle and The Reed Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Hickman v. Little Rock, City of
as 4:2009cv00380
Plaintiff:
Glen Alan Hickman, Jr
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Franke et al v. Parkstone Living Center Inc
as 4:2009cv00341
Plaintiff:
Robert G Franke and Sara Franke Bowling
Defendant:
Parkstone Living Center Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
USA v. Hurt et al
as 3:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
USA, USA and USA
Defendant:
Bobby L Hurt and Sue R Hurt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Stephens et al v. Bristol Park Apartments et al
as 4:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Stephens, Natasha Stephens, Tayler Stephens and others
Defendant:
Bristol Park Apartments and Ledic Management Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sentell v. Horton
as 4:2008cv00630
Plaintiff:
Wanda Sentell
Defendant:
Eutaw Horton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
