Cases 41 - 50 of 1,994
Hafner v. McKee et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Daniel J. McKee, Peter F. Neronha and Gregg Amore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diggs v. CVS Incorporated et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Marcus B. Diggs, Jr.
Defendant:
CVS Incorporated and Anthony Faiola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coes v. Community College of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
David Coes
Defendant:
Community College of Rhode Island, Suzanne Carr, Maddie Josephs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Brown-Allen et al v. DeFelice Management
as 1:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Latoya Brown-Allen and Andrew K. Harding
Defendant:
DeFelice Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Leblanc et al v. City of Pawtucket et al.
as 1:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Noah Leblanc, Stephen Garlick, Manuel Benevides and others
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Mario Comella and John Trenteseaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mello v. Arruda et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello
Defendant:
Edward Arruda and John Rocchio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hood-Harrison v. HallKeen Management et al
as 1:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Kyioshi L Hood-Harrison
Defendant:
HallKeen Management, Inc, Springfield Armoury Limited Partnership and HallKeen Woodland Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
