Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 41 - 50 of 421
Singh et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 5:2023cv00629
Plaintiff: Mr. Jagdev Singh, Mrs. Deyanna M Ingram, Jagdev Singh and others
Defendant: Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of San Francisco v. Azar II et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02405
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco
Defendant: Roger Severino, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar II and others
Petitioner: State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Interested Party: County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae: Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
v. Ibarra
as 3:2023cv01011
Defendant: Nicolas Ibarra, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Holguin v. United States Department of Education We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff: Rudy Holguin
Defendant: United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mandel v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 4:2022cv09189
Plaintiff: Dorothy Mandel
Defendant: U.S. Department of Education, Justice Department Debt Collection Services, Nelnet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pars Equality Center et al v. Pompeo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv07818
Defendant: U.S Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Mike Pompeo and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe # 1, Nicholas Hanout, Afshin Raghebi and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Le v. Director Administrative US Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv08872
Plaintiff: Helen Le
Defendant: Director Administrative US Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Martha v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00420
Plaintiff: George Martha
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?