Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Cases 41 - 50 of 32,360
Richards v. D. Barnes #823 et al
as 9:2024cv00321
Plaintiff: Darius Richards, Benjamin Munson, Anthony Major and others
Defendant: D. Barnes #823, Kim Salm Inmate Coordinator, Lieutenant Michael Slack #125 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00605
Plaintiff: Jared William Jones
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Landry v. Deputy John Doe
as 5:2024cv00606
Plaintiff: Monica Landry
Defendant: Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Lovric
as 9:2024cv00609
Petitioner: David C. Lettieri
Respondent: Miroslav Lovric
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brodeur v. The U.S. Government
as 9:2024cv00604
Petitioner: Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent: The U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johns v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00601
Plaintiff: Alvie Johns
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kopp v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00602
Plaintiff: Aaron J. Kopp
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00596
Plaintiff: Courtney Sara Miller
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?