Cases 41 - 50 of 3,037
BURKE v. LM RESTAURANTS, INC.
as 1:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
BRITTNEY JAZMINE BURKE
Defendant:
LM RESTAURANTS, INC. doing business as CAROLINA ALE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Cobb v. Duke Energy Corporation
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cobb
Defendant:
Duke Energy Corporation
Scarborough v. Access Land & Title Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Patrick K Scarborough and Patrick Scarborough
Defendant:
Access Land & Title Services, Inc. and Enterprise Products Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fowler v. Gilkey Lumber Company, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Sherry Fowler
Defendant:
Gilkey Lumber Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Zhang v. United Health Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Yufan Zhang
Defendant:
United Health Group Inc and Sujatha Duraimanickam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Edwards v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Leo J. Edwards
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Addison-Hill v. Daymark Recovery Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Tawana Addison-Hill
Defendant:
Daymark Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Taylor v. Texmac, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Billy Taylor
Defendant:
Texmac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Henkel v. Scientific Calibration, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Kelly Henkel
Defendant:
Scientific Calibration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Woodall v. Steellion, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Tevan Woodall
Defendant:
Steellion, Inc. doing business as Big Al's Pub and Grubberia, Mariana Conti Schwartz and Matt Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
