Cases 51 - 60 of 323,528
HOOPER v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01900
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JOHN HOOPER
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Theall v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2024cv01892
Plaintiff:
Howard I Theall, Jr
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
DAVIS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv01791
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
WAYNE DAVIS, ALFRED WHITMAN, DOLLIE GRIMES and others
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GIORDANO v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN. COMMISSIONER
as 2:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W GIORDANO, SR
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TURNER v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
RONZELL TURNER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
GEISSELE AUTOMATICS, INC. v. ALL STATE POLICE EQUIPMENT CO.
as 2:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
GEISSELLE AUTOMATICS, INC. and GEISSELE AUTOMATICS, INC.
Defendant:
ALL STATE POLICE EQUIPMENT CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
COHEN v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. COHEN
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, BENSALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZAHAN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
EASRAT ZAHAN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
