Cases 51 - 60 of 153,947
Rumble Canada, Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02880
Plaintiff:
Rumble Canada, Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC and ALPHABET, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Kennedy Jr. et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and American Values 2024
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Operations, LLC, Instagram, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Katz v. Imperial Health Holdings, A Professional Medical Corporation
as 3:2024cv02854
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Katz
Defendant:
Imperial Health Holdings, A Professional Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rosales v. Nathan
as 4:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosales
Defendant:
Paul H. Nathan, Jr.
Counter Claimant:
Paul H Nathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wheatley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02884
Plaintiff:
Charles Wheatley
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams Goyens-Bell Eberwein v. Denney et al
as 3:2024cv02881
Plaintiff:
Chaledeeannka Deborah Ann Williams Goyens-Bell Eberwein
Defendant:
Craig S Denney and N Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rufty et al. v. Monsanto Company et al.
as 3:2024cv02856
Plaintiff:
Gergory A Rufty
Defendant:
Monsanto Company and Bayer A.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
