Cases 51 - 60 of 154
McCormick et al v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Domestic Division et al
as 2:2019cv03329
Defendant:
Catherine White, Hsiu-Chen Lu, Columbus Division of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Moses McCormick and Mark McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berezny et al v. DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. et al
as 1:2019dp20034
Plaintiff:
Edward Berezny and Maureen Berezny
Defendant:
Johnson & Johson Services, Inc., Depuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lloyd v. Pokorny et al
as 5:2019cv00566
Defendant:
Scott Drexel, Dave Yost, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Havens v. O'Connor et al
as 2:2019cv00481
Plaintiff:
Vernon Lee Havens, II
Defendant:
Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor and Judge Steven Beathard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Tucker et al
as 2:2018cv01736
Plaintiff:
Dennis D. Jackson
Defendant:
Anita Harman, Judge Michael L. Tucker, Gregory A. Brush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agosti v. Abrams Home Furnishings, Inc.
as 3:2018cv02570
Defendant:
Abrams Home Furnishings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maureen Agosti
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Lumby v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01354
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maureen Lumby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02410
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. O'Connor et al
as 3:2018cv00314
Defendant:
Ohio Second District Court of Appeals, Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor, State of Ohio State Of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Flora B Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brown v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02044
Defendant:
Tina Gamble, Malary Thomas, Deborah Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
