Cases 51 - 60 of 46,645
Girtler v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Girtler
Respondent:
C Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Kind et al
as 1:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
David Watts
Defendant:
John Kind, Mr Hoffman, Hana Utter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergeron Davila v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Bergeron Davila
Defendant:
Lt Marcus King, CO Palacios, CO Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Schult
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Kimeo Delmar Conley
Defendant:
Tami J Schult
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Jeanpierre
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Sean A Flowers
Defendant:
Cheryl Jeanpierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatlin v. Thompson et al
as 2:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Joshua Odell Gatlin
Defendant:
Angela M Thompson, Kira Labby, Nicholas J Madson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beloit Health System, Inc. v. Savista, LLC
as 3:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Beloit Health System, Inc. doing business as Beloit Memorial Hospital
Defendant:
Savista, LLC and Finthrive Revenue Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bonilla Orozco, Maximilliano v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
Maximilliano Bonilla Orozco
Respondent:
E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Soto, Jose v. Staneic et al
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jose Soto, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Staneic, CO II Billy, Sgt. Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
