Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Rodriguez v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00487
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Margalit Corber et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Margalit Corber , Rene Caro , Steve Dantzler and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gutierrez-Morales et al v. Planck et al
as 5:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Cecilio Gutierrez-Morales , Marcos Moron-Blas , Omar Perez-Morales and others
Defendant:
Earl Lee Planck, Jr., B. S. Land and Cattle Company, LLC, Chad Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez-Penton v. USA
as 3:2014cv00547
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daynell L. Rodriguez-Penton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00138
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Rodriguez v. Butler
as 6:2014cv00109
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Sandra Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Medina et al v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jose Santacruz Medina and Cesar Alvarez Santacruz
Defendant:
Jose Hernandez and Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. JAO Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
JAO Enterprises, LLC, Jaime Magana, Abel Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. $5,747.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$5,747.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Joel David Alcaraz Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Nowell v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2013cv00150
Petitioner:
Frederick Bradley Nowell, Sr.
Respondent:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and Carlos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
