Cases 51 - 60 of 419
ASBERRY v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ASBERRY
Defendant:
WARDEN DARRIN MYERS, WARDEN JIMMY MYLES, WARDEN SHARON OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. GNADT et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
ETSUKO BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL GNADT and CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
DEONTRE WILLIAMS, DEANDRE LOWE, Samuel Sanders and others
Cross Defendant:
Inmate PAUL L. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Coleman et al
as 1:2022cv04801
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lynn Harrison
Defendant:
Audrey Bailey Coleman and Donovan A. March
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Boyd v. Bailey et al
as 1:2022cv04681
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Inmate Paul L. Bailey, Deontre Williams, Deandre Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
LEE v. GEE et al
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
TIDEOUS LEE
Defendant:
DET GEE, SGT SILVERBERG and DET BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ATTORNEY BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee v. Gee et al
as 1:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Tideous Lee
Defendant:
Det. Gee, Sgt. Silverberg and Det. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
