Cases 51 - 60 of 357
Vinet v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv05824
Plaintiff:
Richard J Vinet
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and Dean Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Solti v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv04884
Plaintiff:
Balazs Solti
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Ineedmone, graduathe62 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Patterson TMP Operating, LLC et al v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, et al
as 1:2021cv04658
Plaintiff:
Patterson TMP Operating, LLC, Golden Tree Restaurants, LLC, Biscuitville Fresh Southern and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Koch Foods, Inc., JCG Foods of Alabama, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00693
Defendant:
C/O Swisher, Lieutenant Miller, C/O Hagston and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00683
Defendant:
R. Oleary, Chad Adams, C/O Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00664
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Adams, Mr. Spiller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Chapman et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
C. Heck, Treg Vanderkhove, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Maywood Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv03081
Defendant:
Village of Maywood, Sgt. Babicz, Ofc. Gorley and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Liddell Lacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. Segal
as 1:2021cv01164
Defendant:
Michael Segal
Petitioner:
Sebastian Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
