Cases 51 - 60 of 124
ASHFORD v. HAWKINBERRY et al
as 2:2014cv01718
Plaintiff:
AILEAF ASHFORD
Defendant:
ROBERT HAWKINBERRY, PARKER, WORKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid-Douglas et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2014cv01172
Plaintiff:
Steven Reid-Douglas, Thomas Scott and Daliyl Muhammad
Defendant:
John Wetzel, James Barnacle, David Pitkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05823
Plaintiff:
SAMONA MYERS , GLORIA NEIMARK , MARIA NICKERSON and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxton v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas, Eric Holder, Charles Samuel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. v. TROSPER
as 2:2013cv01640
Plaintiff:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
TANNER TROSPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
TANNER v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS et al
as 2:2012cv03897
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH L. TANNER
Defendant:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, ENDO PHARMACEUTICAL HOLDINGS, INC., AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01027
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JONES , ROBERT HARRIS , KEVIN LEWIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEARSON et al v. TANNER et al
as 2:2012cv00798
Plaintiff:
JEFFRY S. PEARSON and ALLEN L. FEINGOLD
Defendant:
MARK W. TANNER, THERESA ALLEN, JERRY ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TANNER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49872
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE TANNER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Gaballa et al v. Tanner
as 4:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
Mahmoud A Gaballa and Maha Gaballa
Defendant:
Stacey L Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
