Cases 51 - 60 of 133
Fodge et al v. Trustmark National Bank et al
as 5:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Steven D Fodge , Joseph E Carey , Jon A Tokay and others
Defendant:
Trustmark National Bank , Ocwen Loan Servicing L L C , Barksdale Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carey v. Vannoy
as 5:2017cv01641
Plaintiff:
Demond Carey
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv12157
Plaintiff:
Carey Mitchell
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorsey v. Boise Cascade Co et al
as 2:2017cv01309
Plaintiff:
Carey Dwayne Dorsey
Defendant:
Boise Cascade Co and Protemp Staffing Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carey v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
as 2:2017cv09027
Plaintiff:
Ahnamaria Carey
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carey v. MIE Properties-LA, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00477
Defendant:
Bankston & Associates, LLC and MIE Properties-LA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garrison v. Deville et al
as 1:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
Carey Garrison
Defendant:
James Deville, Chelette, Bobby Toler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Davis et al
as 3:2017cv00604
Plaintiff:
Craig Carey
Defendant:
Windell Davis, Johnathan Hatten and Tammy Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv00998
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marie Carey
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carey et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00934
Plaintiff:
Calvin Carey and Robin Jay Carey
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
