Cases 51 - 60 of 272
Garcia (PS) v. Ciolli et al.
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Wilson Wifred Luargas Garcia
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Merrick Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv01825
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. Ciolli
as 23-1201
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC KING
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden, Florence FCC and ADX, United States Bureau of Prisons
Shields v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv01429
Petitioner:
Shawn C. Shields
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Petty v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv01432
Petitioner:
Ishmael Petty
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mebane v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2023cv01355
Petitioner:
J.T. Mebane
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vining v. Private Contractor, GEO Group et al
as 3:2023cv50201
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vining
Defendant:
Private Contractor, GEO Group, Gonzales, A. Leeper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosby v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2023cv01274
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, M. Banuelos, J. Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vining v. Private Contractor, GEO Group et al
as 5:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vining
Defendant:
Private Contractor, GEO Group, Deputy Gonzales, A. Leeper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamrick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv01098
Petitioner:
Rodney Curtis Hamrick and Rodney C. Hamrick
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ian Connors, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
