Cases 51 - 60 of 614
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jenkins v. King
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ty TyesheaPatricia Jenkins, Carlyn Jenkins and Ty Tyeshea Patricia Jenkins
Defendant:
FNU King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank National Association, v. Linwood Holton et al
as 3:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association,
Defendant:
Geneva Linwood Holton, Senora Linwood, Eva Linwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01362
Plaintiff:
Tyrone-Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadfield v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Brian Broadfield
Defendant:
United States of America, NFN Russell, NFN Zook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv00777
Petitioner:
Antwune Ladon Jenkins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamar Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
