Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Morton v. E. Kenneth Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02882
Plaintiff:
Cindy Morton
Defendant:
E. Kenneth Wall & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nordman v. Worthington et al
as 1:2012cv01189
Defendant:
Julius Worthington, Jackson-Madison County School System Board of Education and Morton Taylor
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nordman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nordman v. Worthington et al
as 1:2012cv01188
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nordman
Defendant:
Julius Worthington, Jackson-Madison County School System Board of Education and Taylor Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Jumbo Holdings, LLC
as 3:2012cv00390
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , MJ Publishing Trust , Tokeco Tunes and others
Defendant:
Jumbo Holdings, LLC, Allen Morton and Sandra Morton
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Morton et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc
as 2:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
Donna Morton and Ronald Morton
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Hairo Garcia
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security , Janet Napolitano , United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Morton v. Lindamood
as 2:2011cv02965
Petitioner:
Thomas Morton
Respondent:
Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Holder et al
as 2:2011cv02727
Petitioner:
Jae Hyop Lee
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, John T. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morton et al v. Hale
as 1:2011cv01245
Plaintiff:
Jim Ed Morton , Tena Morton and Staci Morton
Defendant:
Georgiana Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
