Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Ruffino v. Murphy et al
as 3:2009cv01287
Plaintiff:
Jake J. Ruffino
Defendant:
Scott Murphy, Brett Salafia, Michael Kudish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Social Security, Commissioner Of
as 3:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Roddelynne Gail Murray
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner Of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murray v. Social Security, Commissioner Of
as 3:2009mc00066
Plaintiff:
Roddelynne Gail Murray
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner Of
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Murray v. Mitsubishi Motors NA Inc et al
as 3:2008cv01729
Plaintiff:
Sarah Murray
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Motors NA Inc and Bridgestone/Firestone Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Odom v. Matteo et al
as 3:2008cv01569
Plaintiff:
Debra Odom
Defendant:
Gilbert J. Matteo, Murray Pendleton and City of Waterford
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Samson v. Stevens et al
as 3:2008cv01484
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Samson
Defendant:
Russell Stevens, Thomas Murray, James McLain and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Health Svc & Ins Plan v. Laidlaw Transit Inc et al
as 3:2008cv01391
Plaintiff:
Health Svc & Ins Plan
Defendant:
Laidlaw Transit Inc and Michael C. Murray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
National Grange Mutual Ins Co -v- Judson Const Co
as 3:2008cv00981
Plaintiff:
National Grange Mutual Ins Co
Defendant:
Judson Const Inc, Nathan Judson, Patric Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunnicutt v. Dinguis et al
as 3:2007cv01628
Plaintiff:
Carnell Hunnicutt
Defendant:
William Dinguis, James Turner, Darrell Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
