Cases 51 - 60 of 116
Sanders #146274 v. Trinity Services Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01471
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin Sanders
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group Incorporated, Laura Donnelly, Unknown De Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. Napier et al
as 4:2018cv00244
Plaintiff:
Micheal Andrew Nunez
Defendant:
Mark D Napier, Joshua Arnold, Pima County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore #275487 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00859
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Moore
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Carson McWilliams, Ruben Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silvas v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04505
Plaintiff:
Matthew Silvas
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silvas #048381 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00483
Petitioner:
Raul Santos Silvas
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silva v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2017cv03220
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Silva
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Silva v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv02258
Plaintiff:
Dolores M Silva
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cervantes v. McClintock et al
as 4:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Roberto R Cervantes
Defendant:
Susan G McClintock, J Cox, Joseph Zevallos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foley #072158 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
Rick Alton Foley
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan , T Scott, Unknown Silvas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sego v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2016cv04550
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sego
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
