Cases 51 - 60 of 116
NEW-HOWARD v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv06414
Plaintiff:
DEONNE R. NEW-HOWARD
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., U.S. BANK, N.A., DUANE MORRIS, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WIGGINS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv03889
Petitioner:
LEROY WIGGINS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and TOM WOLF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Proctor v. McCullough et al
as 3:2015cv00988
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Proctor
Defendant:
McCullough, S. Ellenberger, The Five Program Review Committee Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIGGINS v. SWEENEY et al
as 5:2015cv02004
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WIGGINS
Defendant:
ED SWEENEY, HUNSBERGER, MOLLY LONGACRER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Sweeney et al
as 1:2015cv00577
Plaintiff:
Willie Wiggins
Defendant:
Ed Sweeney, Hunsberger, Molly Longacrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUENTES-CANALES v. WIGGINS
as 3:2014cv00133
Petitioner:
RUDY ISMAEL PUENTES-CANALES
Respondent:
GEORGE WIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WIGGINS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03518
Plaintiff:
ILLA WIGGINS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JANI et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2014cv02064
Plaintiff:
SUNNY JANI , ROGER CRAIG , VERNESSIA CRAIG and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WIGGINS v. GAVIN
as 2:2013cv07504
Petitioner:
DWAYNE S. WIGGINS
Respondent:
WAYNE J. GAVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
