Cases 51 - 60 of 259
KELLEY v. A. C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67555
Plaintiff:
HOWARD B KELLEY
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC. , A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, AIRCO/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67682
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SCOTT
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAVAREZ v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67703
Plaintiff:
MANUEL TAVAREZ
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OVERTON v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67671
Plaintiff:
JOHN OVERTON
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67688
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNLAP v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv64588
Plaintiff:
ALTA MARIAN DUNLAP
Defendant:
AC&S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP, THE, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUELLER v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv64590
Plaintiff:
GENEVIEVE T. MUELLER
Defendant:
AC&S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP, THE , A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mann v. Airco/The BOC Group, Inc.
as 4:2009mc00140
Plaintiff:
David Mann
Defendant:
Airco/The BOC Group, Inc.
SMITH v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv64748
Plaintiff:
JACK SMITH
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., AIRCO, INC./BOC GROUP, THE, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Falco et al v. Airco/The Boc Group, Inc et al
as 1:2009wf17060
Plaintiff:
Antonio Falco and Lucia Falco
Defendant:
Hobart Brothers Company, Lincoln Electric Company, Airco/The BOC Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
