Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Costa v. Andrew Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv12110
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Tina Costa
Interested Party: Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carroll v. Social Security
as 1:2019cv12076
Plaintiff: David D. Carroll
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sutherland v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11989
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Brian Sutherland
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lemieux v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11961
Plaintiff: Jean Paul Lemieux
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disessa v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11945
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Anthony Disessa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Cheslawski v. Saul
as 3:2019cv11923
Plaintiff: Michael Cheslawski
Defendant: Social Security Administration and Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Aziz v. Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv11885
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Catherine Fiorello Aziz
Interested Party: Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gem v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv11865
Defendant: Social Security Administration and Commissioner Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Ladefara Gem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
DeRosa v. Saul et al
as 1:2019cv11802
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Priscilla DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Ives v. Saul et al
as 3:2019cv30114
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Tammy Ives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?