Cases 51 - 60 of 791
Pileggi et al v. Mathias et al
as 3:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Katharine Pileggi and Anthony Pileggi
Defendant:
Kim Mathias, Joette Katz, Kaela Minerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gartner Inc v. G2.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01291
Plaintiff:
Gartner, Inc.
Defendant:
G2.com, Inc., Nicholas Domino, Richard Rolbiecki and others
Andrews v. Dooley
as 3:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey P. Andrews
Defendant:
Kari A. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bankwell Bank v. Medlegal LLP et al
as 3:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Bankwell Bank
Defendant:
Medlegal LLP, Medlogic, LLC, Harry R Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Impellitteri v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv01086
Petitioner:
Andrew Impellitteri
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hernandez-Rosas v. Flik's Enterprises, LLC
as 3:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Hernandez-Rosas
Defendant:
Flik's Enterprises, LLC doing business as Flik's Fencing and Landscaping and Andrew Flach
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanes et al v. Vasquez et al
as 3:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Braulio Sanes and Jennifer Matos
Defendant:
Carlos Vasquez, John Does, City of Bridgeport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews v. Shea
as 3:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Andrews
Defendant:
Michael P Shea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrews v. Hall et al
as 3:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Andrews
Defendant:
Janet C. Hall, Vatti S. Dave, Benjamin Grillot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
