Cases 51 - 60 of 181
Michael L. Overton v. ASH-Exec. et al
as 2:2018cv04745
Defendant:
ASH-Exec., Doe and Doe
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Aleem v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2018cv01210
Plaintiff:
Farooq Abdul Aleem
Defendant:
J. Lizarraga, M. Ashe and Richard Weiss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. McDaniel, et al.
as 1:2018cv00640
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ash
Defendant:
E. McDaniel, Lance Acakaki, G. Lai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Los Angeles v. L.A. Terminals, Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv02788
Defendant:
Ash-Cross Evans Corporation, Does, Hooker Chemical Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Plaintiff:
City of Los Angeles
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
L.A. Terminals, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
L.A. Terminals, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
L.A. Terminals, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation
ThirdParty Defendant:
Phillip 66 Company
Myers v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dallas Joshua James Myers
Defendant:
Edmund Gerry Brown, David Smiley, Richard Graig Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berihu Hadera Fkadu v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2017cv09130
Defendant:
ASHs Graphic Arts, ASHs Graphic Arts, ASHs Librarians and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Malik v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2017cv06954
Plaintiff:
Yasmin Malik
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Solano County and Sonny Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fkadu v. Brown et al
as 2:2017cv07469
Defendant:
ASHs Graphic Arts, ASHs Graphic Arts, ASHs Librarians and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Baker v. Ash
as 2:2017cv01484
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Baker, III
Defendant:
P. Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overton v. ASH Chief Medical Officer
as 5:2017cv00464
Petitioner:
Michael L. Overton
Respondent:
ASH Chief Medical Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
