Cases 51 - 60 of 117
Ellis v. Allied Van Lines Inc
as 2:2015cv00638
Plaintiff:
Jane Ellis
Defendant:
Allied Van Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simons et al v. Coleman American Moving Services Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01290
Plaintiff:
Cindy Simons and Lynn Simons
Defendant:
Coleman American Moving Services Inc and Allied Van Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Morris v. Mayflower Transit, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Merna C. Morris
Defendant:
Mayflower Transit, LLC , Lincoln Moving & Storage, Inc. and APACA Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act
Foster v. Morgan Van Lines Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00437
Plaintiff:
Brittney Foster
Defendant:
Morgan Van Lines Inc , David Dewayne Collums and Alfa Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ward v. Morgan Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01325
Plaintiff:
Darryl Shawn Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Morgan Van Lines, Inc. and David Dewayne Collums
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cedeno v. Greyhound Lines Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00597
Plaintiff:
Pablo Cedeno
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc and L C Coty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Meadows v. A-C Product Liability Trust et al
as 1:2012cv00641
Plaintiff:
Roger Lynn Meadows
Defendant:
A-C Product Liability Trust, ACandS, Inc., Acorn Iron & Supply Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
