Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Bergmanis v. United Air Lines, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00794
Plaintiff:
Erik A. Bergmanis
Defendant:
United Air Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bergmanis v. United Air Lines, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00794
Plaintiff:
Erik A. Bergmanis
Defendant:
United Air Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cooney v. Usher et al
as 4:2012cv00038
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and George Lee Usher
Plaintiff:
Margaret Cooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutherland v. Mason and Dixon Lines Inc., et al.
as 4:2011cv01764
Plaintiff:
David Keith Sutherland
Defendant:
Mason and Dixon Lines Inc. and James E Yocum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AWGI, LLC et al v. Atlas Cargo International, LLC
as 6:2011cv03370
Plaintiff:
AWGI, LLC and Atlas Van Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
Atlas Cargo International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Gilmore et al v. Greyhound Lines, Inc
as 4:2011cv00719
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Gilmore and Rashawn Calhoun
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Central States v. Hankins Truck Lines, Inc.
as 4:2011mc00375
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
Hankins Truck Lines, Inc.
Acme Truck Line, Inc. v. NYP of Michigan, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00511
Plaintiff:
Acme Truck Line, Inc.
Defendant:
NYP of Michigan, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
NYP of Michigan, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Acme Truck Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayflower Transit L.L.C. et al v. Taylor Truck Line, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00753
Plaintiff:
Mayflower Transit L.L.C.
Defendant:
Taylor Truck Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valadez v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00216
Defendant:
Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. and Dennis D. Watts
Plaintiff:
Fernando C. Valadez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
