Cases 51 - 60 of 95
v. Jaworowski et al
as 2:2018cv04956
Defendant:
Justin R Jaworowski and AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
PISCITELLO v. AMTRAK
as 2:2018cv01970
Plaintiff:
DOREEN PISCITELLO
Defendant:
AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BYERS et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2018cv01707
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BYERS and LISA BYERS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FITZSIMMONS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 3:2018cv01350
Plaintiff:
JESSE FITZSIMMONS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. THE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE (TRENTON, NJ) et al
as 3:2017cv12902
Plaintiff:
LUZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE (TRENTON, NJ), THE DEPARTMENT OF SECURITY GUARD AT AMTRAK, AUTTRA POLICE GUARD IN TRENTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEGGS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 3:2017cv12766
Plaintiff:
CARL PEGGS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
AKAL v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 3:2017cv12032
Plaintiff:
MARK AKAL
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
RINYU v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 3:2017cv08113
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RINYU
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv07958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
