Cases 51 - 60 of 133
Armstrong v. Strickland & Sons Pipeline, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00271
Plaintiff:
James Armstrong
Defendant:
Strickland & Sons Pipeline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
ARMSTRONG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2017cv00222
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ledbetter v. IDN-Armstrong's, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04157
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Ledbetter
Defendant:
IDN-Armstrong's, Inc. and IDN Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lincoln Property Company v. Adult International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03164
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Property Company
Defendant:
Adult International, Inc. and Gregory Armstrong-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2017cv00319
Petitioner:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02836
Plaintiff:
North American Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, John F. Carter and Matthew G. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pippen et al v. Fulton County, Georgia
as 1:2017cv00362
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Pippen and William Armstrong, Jr.
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
ARMSTRONG v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT et al
as 5:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
CORDIA RENEE ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT , LOAD ONE LLC and WILLIE JAMES WIMBERLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
