Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 224
Lindokuhle Mnyandu El v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 8:2021cv00528
Defendant: Shirley N. Weber, Xavier Becerra, Akeeba Ivana Maze and others
Plaintiff: Lindokuhle Mnyandu El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Secretary et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00519
Plaintiff: Lawrence Christopher Smith
Defendant: Secretary and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACA Connects, et al v. Rob Bonta We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15430
Plaintiff / Appellant: NCTA-THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, USTELECOM - THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION, CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Amicus Curiae: CALINNOVATES, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TECHFREEDOM and others
Terrance Marsh, et al v. AFSCME Local 3299, et al
as 21-15309
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERRANCE MARSH, KAREN JORDAN, BARBARA GROSSE and others
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, MICHAEL V. DRAKE, M.D., M.D., in his official capacity as President of the University of California and AFSCME LOCAL 3299
Huguette Young v. CA DMV, et al
as 21-15305
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as attorney general of California, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Plaintiff / Appellant: HUGUETTE NICOLE YOUNG
Kristina Semerjyan v. Service Employees Internationa, et al
as 21-55104
Defendant / Appellee: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 2015, a labor organization, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and BETTY T. YEE, in her official capacity as State Controller of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellant: KRISTINA SEMERJYAN
South Bay United Pentecostal, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-56358
Plaintiff / Appellant: BISHOP ARTHUR HODGES III, an individual and SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, a California nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California, WILLIAM D. GORE, in his official capacity as Sheriff of the County of San Diego and others
Wendy Gish, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-56324
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT LOVINGGOOD, in his official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor, KAREN SPIEGEL, in her official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor, JANICE RUTHERFORD, in her official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRENDA WOOD, WENDY GISH, PATRICK SCALES and others
Matthew Brach, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56291
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California, TONY THURMOND, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction and Director of Education, SONIA Y. ANGELL, in her official capacity as the State Public Health Officer and Department of Public Health Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALISON WALSH, an individual, Z. R., a minor, MARIANNA BEMA and others
Best Supplement Guide, LLC, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-17362
Defendant: MARCIA CUNNINGHAM, MARK CHANDLER, in his official capacity as a member of the Lodi City Council, DOUG KUEHNE, in his official capacity as a member of the Lodi City Council and Mayor of Lodi and others
Defendant / Appellee: SONIA Y. ANGELL, MD, MPH, in her official capacityas the Director and State Public Health, COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SEAN COVELL and BEST SUPPLEMENT GUIDE, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?