Cases 51 - 59 of 59
David Cox v. Ronald Reagan, et al
as 09-5574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D. COX
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD REAGAN, Individually and in his official capacity, UNKNOWN DEPUTY SHERIFFS, of the Blount County Sheriff's Department, JAMES BERRONG, Sheriff of Blount County, Tennessee and others
The Estate of Leeroy Hickman Jr. v. Moore et al
as 3:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Leeroy Hickman Jr.
Defendant:
Doug Moore, Doug Moore, Lesley Craig and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hickman v. Moore et al
as 3:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Janice Hickman
Defendant:
Doug Moore, Lesley Craig, Robert Berkley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allison v. Berrong et al
as 3:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Gregory S Allison
Defendant:
James Berrong, Blount County, Tennessee and John Does
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McBride v. Blount County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2008cv00371
Plaintiff:
Frank McBride
Defendant:
Blount County, Tennessee, Blount County Sheriff's Department, City of Townsend, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Southerland v. Blount County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2007cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jamey Southerland and Jamey Southerland
Defendant:
Blount County, Tennessee, James Latham, Gary Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight et al v. Maryville, City of, et al
as 3:2007cv00342
Plaintiff:
John Knight, John Knight, Cindy Knight and others
Defendant:
Maryville, City of, Tony Crisp, Tony Crisp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nuchols, et al v. Berrong, et al
as 06-6132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JO DEAN NUCHOLS and DAVID NUCHOLS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BERRONG, TONY CRISP and BLOUNT COUNTY, TENNESSEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
