Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Artis et al v. Amphenol Corporation
as 3:2011cv00876
Plaintiff:
Crystal Artis , Helen Ballard , Raymond Ballard and others
Defendant:
Amphenol Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stepan v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05140
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stepan
Defendant:
The City of New York , Henry Ko, Joseph Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Gerova Financial Group LTD. et al
as 1:2011cv03796
Plaintiff:
Wayne T. Bonner
Defendant:
Gerova Financial Group LTD., Gary Hirst, Michael Hlavsa and others
Movant:
Stillwater Investors
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Povoski v. LaValley et al
as 9:2011cv00120
Defendant:
R. Carine, Kevin Hart, Daniel Clancy and others
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Povoski, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. Universal Music Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05312
Plaintiff:
John Taylor and Everton Bonner
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc., Island Records, Inc., Polygram Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv04946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daly et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04755
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daly and Ellen Daly
Defendant:
The City of New York and Joseph Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04608
Plaintiff:
Rendell Robinson
Defendant:
The City of New York, The County of New York, Jason Sutliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cobb v. Bonner et al
as 1:2009cv00441
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Cobb
Defendant:
Dwight Bonner and John Doe, "Son" of above (Defendant)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
