Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Lacey v. Braxton et al
as 7:2010cv00139
Defendant:
Daniel Braxton, Phyllis Byrd, Lieutenant Canterbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Valentine v. Newport News Neighborhood Federal Credit Union et al
as 4:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Gardner Valentine
Defendant:
Newport News Neighborhood Federal Credit Union, Audrea Lambert, Sharon Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Mesghinna v. Braxton
as 1:2009cv00956
Petitioner:
Estafanos Mesghinna
Respondent:
Daniel A. Braxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braxton v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Shamanise Braxton, Shamanise Braxton, Shamanise Braxton and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2680 Federal Tort Claim Act Medical Malpractice
Smith et al v. Cox Transportation Services, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00428
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Smith and Aubrey Braxton Chumney
Defendant:
Cox Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Huffman et al
as 7:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
Chauncey A. Williams
Defendant:
L.W. Huffman, Braxton and T.A. Spangler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boxley v. Braxton
as 7:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Earl Lamont Boxley, Sr.
Defendant:
D. A. Braxton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barnes v. Braxton
as 3:2008cv00840
Petitioner:
Jerry Lamont Barnes
Respondent:
Daniel A. Braxton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McClellan v. Braxton et al
as 7:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen McClellan
Defendant:
D. A. Braxton and S. Conner
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
