Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alley Drug Stores Partnership et al v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02564
Plaintiff:
Alley Drug Stores Partnership and Holmes Oil Company Inc
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of and Baptist Health System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Evanston Insurance Company v. Baptist Health System, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Baptist Health System, Inc. and Shull Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Quinn v. Mississippi Baptist Health Systems et al
as 3:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Sharon Quinn and Sharon Quinn
Defendant:
Mississippi Baptist Health Systems and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cason v. Princeton Baptist Medical Center et al
as 2:2008cv01583
Plaintiff:
Kay Cason and Kay Cason
Defendant:
Princeton Baptist Medical Center, Princeton Baptist Medical Center, Baptist Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
