Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Prescott et al v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv10220
Plaintiff:
Daniel Prescott, Alexander Ortiz and George Dye
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, City of New York and NYC Board Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott et al v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv10219
Plaintiff:
Daniel Prescott and George Dye
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, City of NY Municipality and New York City Board of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Thomas et al
as 1:2009cv08413
Plaintiff:
Oliver Berry
Defendant:
Thomas, The Dept. of Corr. Sevices, The C.R.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. N.Y.S Dept. of Parole et al
as 1:2008cv09846
Plaintiff:
Judah Johnson
Defendant:
N.Y.S Dept. of Parole, N.Y.C. Board of Corrections, A.L.J. Terry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wesley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv07132
Plaintiff:
Michael Donnel Wesley
Defendant:
City of New York, Canino, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wesley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv07133
Plaintiff:
Michael Donnel Wesley
Defendant:
City of New York, Gaines, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. New York City Department of Correction et al
as 1:2007cv08126
Plaintiff:
Freddy Colon Rodriguez
Defendant:
New York City Department of Correction, New York City Board of Correction and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wesley v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv05475
Plaintiff:
Michael Donnel Wesley
Defendant:
The City of New York, Gaines, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wesley v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv05476
Plaintiff:
Michael Donnel Wesley
Defendant:
The City of New York, Gaines, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
