Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Stafford v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv02042
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Stafford
Defendant:
James Hartley, N. Lopez, H. R. Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Keith Strobel v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2009cv01088
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Strobel
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue, Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Type:
Social Security
Brian Keith Dent v. Mike Knowles
as 2:2008cv05255
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Dent
Respondent:
Mike Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montgomery v. Sisto
as 2:2008cv03180
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Montgomery
Respondent:
D.K. Sisto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dent v. Silbaugh et al
as 2:2008cv00736
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Dent
Defendant:
D Silbaugh, H. Murthy and City of Vacaville
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Montgomery vs. Sisto, et al.,
as 2:2008cv00381
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Montgomery
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Felkner
as 2:2007cv02649
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Brown
Respondent:
- Felkner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Keith Hodges v. Holiday Inn Select
as 1:2007cv01169
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Hodges
Defendant:
Holiday Inn Select
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Medina et al
as 4:2007cv04071
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Barnett
Defendant:
Eloy Medina, Michael Evans, D. A. Travers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Keith Brim v. J.L. Norwood et al
as 2:2007cv04473
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Brim
Respondent:
J. L. Norwood and Ricardo E. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
