Cases 51 - 60 of 213
(PC) Jackson v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2021cv00452
Defendant:
V. Rojo, J. Swanson, M. Pitchford and others
Plaintiff:
Duwayne M. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfeiffer v. Reltco, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C. Pfeiffer
Defendant:
Reltco, Inc., Filo Mortgage, LLC. and United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Garcia v. Newsom et al
as 3:2021cv01034
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Garcia and Borgia Castillon Avelino
Defendant:
Liza Echeverria, Avelino Castilon Castellanos, Camarillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Singleton Perkins v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Devon Samuel James Singleton Perkins
Defendant:
R. Godwin, R. Cavazos, C. Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillon Torres v. Jehova et al
as 1:2021cv00135
Defendant:
Manuel Lopez Obrador, Jhon Maribel Guardia, Putin Vladimir and others
Plaintiff:
Avelino Castillon Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cruz v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2020cv01825
Defendant:
S. Ballestoro, W.J. Sullivan, C. Pfeiffer and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Thomas v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 20-17472
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and C. PFEIFFER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
Jerry Dillingham v. J. Garcia, et al
as 20-17269
Defendant / Appellee:
S. KERNAN, K. BROWN, J. GARCIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY KENT DILLINGHAM
Arturo Herrera v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2020cv10583
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and C. Pfeiffer
Petitioner:
Arturo Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Thompson v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2020cv01619
Defendant:
S. Sargent, D. Stanley, D. Badger and others
Plaintiff:
Rahn Gregory Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
