Cases 51 - 60 of 27,100
John W Mcdanal, Sr v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
John W. McDanal, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gessell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv02645
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Gessell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Hansen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03671
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leo Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duran v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03675
Plaintiff:
Doreen Duran
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heffelfinger et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03665
Plaintiff:
Juan Heffelfinger and Renai Heffelfinger
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gravel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03667
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Gravel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bracero v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03659
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan Bracero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MEDINA v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03660
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ZAYAS v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03661
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ZAYAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zoll v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03663
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Zoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
