Cases 51 - 60 of 96
French v. Snake River Corr Inst et al
as 2:2015cv02436
Defendant:
S. Cook, Jill E. Curtis, Supt. Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Snake River Corr Inst et al
as 2:2015cv02196
Defendant:
S. Cook, Jill Curtis, Supt. M. Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Snake River Corr Inst et al
as 2:2015cv02194
Defendant:
S. Cook, Jill Curtis, Supt. M. Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Snake River Corr Inst et al
as 2:2015cv02195
Defendant:
S. Cook, Jill Curtis, M. Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barclay v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2015cv01920
Defendant:
Wells B. Ashby, Glen D. Baisinger, Thomas A. Balmer and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Barclay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cook v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv01891
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Marla Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
French v. Snake River Corr Inst, et, al et al
as 2:2015cv00601
Defendant:
S. Cook, Jill Curtis, Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. MADAC, LLC, et al
as 6:2014cv01037
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Buffalo Prairie Songs, Carnival Music Company and others
Defendant:
MACDAC, LLC, Darcy R. Macey and Steven J. Macey
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201 Americans With Disabilities Act-Injured Worker Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
