Cases 51 - 60 of 131
Electric Power Supply Association et al v. Star et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Plaintiff:
Electric Power Supply Association , Dynegy Inc. , Eastern Generation, LLC and others
Defendant:
Anthony M Star , Brien J Sheahan , John R. Rosales and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Oak Grove Management Company v. EPA, et al
as 16-1206
Petitioner:
Oak Grove Management Company, LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA
as 16-1210
Petitioner:
Utility Air Regulatory Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Southern Company Services, Inc, et al v. EPA
as 16-1208
Petitioner:
Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
State of Alabama, et al v. EPA
as 16-1204
Intervenor:
American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Exelon Corporation and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
Robert P. Mason, Celia Y. Chen, Noelle Eckley Selin and others
Petitioner:
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas, State of Arizona and others
ARIPPA v. EPA
as 16-1175
Petitioner:
ARIPPA
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 16-1127
Intervenor:
American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, State of California and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, Gina McCarthy and others
Amicus Curiae:
Robert P. Mason, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, Joel D. Blum and others
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
Data Carriers, LLC v. Calpine Corporation
as 2:2015cv01016
Plaintiff:
Data Carriers, LLC
Defendant:
Calpine Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
